Massappo Wannua Tradition in Barru Regency: A Semiotic Study

Muhibuddin Muhibuddin; Muhammad Taufik

Authors

Muhibuddin Muhibuddin Universitas Islam Makassar
Muhammad Taufik Universitas Islam Makassar

Keywords:

Bugis tradition, Charles Sander Pierce's Semiotics, massapo wanua, semiotic, symbols

Abstract

This research analyzes the Massappo Wanua tradition in Lapao Hamlet, Binuang Village, Barru Regency, using a semiotic approach. This tradition, which is performed annually by the Bugis community, aims to protect the village from disasters and maintain the balance between humans and nature. This research explores the symbols used in the ritual as well as the meaning of each symbol related to spiritual, social, and ecological values. The research method used is qualitative with data collection techniques in the form of participatory observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the research using the theory of Charles Sander Pierce's Semiotics show that symbols such as rekkko ota, addupa-dupaang, and benno not only function ritually, but also reflect values such as welfare, honesty, and harmonious relationships between humans, nature, and spirituality. The findings enrich the understanding of Bugis people's cosmological relationship with nature and the ecological relevance of cultural practices that are preserved for generations.

References

Abdulsyani. (2007). Sosiologi : Skematika, Teori, dan Terapan.

Ainun, C., & Irnawati, I. (2022). Makna Tradisi Maccelleccelleng Dalam Perkawinan Adat Bugis Di Desa Padang Lampe Kecamatan Ma’rang Kabupaten Pangkep. SOURCE: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 160-175.

Ardhani, F. (2014). Perbedaan Kepuasan Perkawinan Pada Wanita Suku Bugis, Jawa, dan Banjar di Kecamatan Balikpapan Selatan Kota Balikpapan. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi.

Bakti, A. F. (2010). Diaspora Bugis di alam Melayu Nusantara: Ininnawa.

Budiman, A. (2016). Analisis Simbol Simbol Dalam Tradisi Betimpas di Dusun Selanglet Lombok Tengah: Kajian Semiotika Roland Barthes. Universitas Mataram. http://eprints. unram. ac. id/3168/1/JURNAL. pdf.

Danial, E., & Wasriah, N. (2009). Metode penulisan karya ilmiah. Bandung: Laboraturium Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.

Faruk. (1999). Kritik Sosial dalam Wacana Pembangunan. Retrieved from URI: https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=145700

Gunawan, H., Nugraheni, L., & Roysa, M. (2023). Makna Simbolik Tradisi Lempogan Desa Kutuk (Kajian Semiotika Roland Barthes). Kala: Jurnal Ilmiah Sastra, 1(1), 14-28.

Kriyantono, R. (2020). Practical Techniques of Communication Research: Accompanied by Practical Examples of Media Research, Public Relations, Advertising, Organizational Communications. Marketing Communications. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Kusuma, P. K. N., & Nurhayati, I. K. (2017). Analisis semiotika roland barthes pada ritual otonan di Bali. Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi, 1(2), 195-217.

Mudjiyanto, B., & Nur, E. (2013). Semiotics in Research Method of Communication [Semiotika Dalam Metode Penelitian Komunikasi].

Pancana, R. K. C. P. A. (2017). La Galigo Menurut Naskah NBG 188 jilid 1: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Pardah, A. (2022). Makna Simbolik Mappacci Adat Pernikahan Bugis DI Makassar (Kajian Charles Sanders Pierce). digital library universitas muhammadiyah makassar.

Pelras, C. (2006). Manusia Bugis / Christian Pelras ; penerjemah Abdul Rahman Abu ... [et al.].

Sari, Z. (2019). Makna-Makna Budaya Dalam Ritual Maddojabine Di Kampiri Desa Congko Kabupaten Soppeng Analisis Semiotika. Universitas Hasanuddin.

Sobur, A. (2009). Semiotika Komunikasi, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Wacana Media.

Sulastri. (2018). Semiotik Dalam Tradisi Massuro Mabacca Masyarakat Desa Sawaru Kecamatan Camba Kabupaten Maros. Unismuh Makassar.

Teeuw, A. (1984). Sastra dan ilmu sastra: Pengantar teori sastra. (No Title).

Tjahjono, G. (2011). Benny H. Hoed, Semiotik dan dinamika sosial budaya. Second Edition. Depok: Komunitas Bambu, 2011, xxvi + 317 pp. [First Edition 2007, Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia.] ISBN 979-3731-87-7. Price: IDR 70,000 (soft cover). Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 13, 386-389.

Wahyu, R. (2016). Makna Simbolik Tradisi Sedekah Bumi Legenanan Pada Masyarakat Desa Kalirejo Kecamatan Talun Kabupaten Pekalongan. Semarang (ID): Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Waskita, D. (2011). Pengantar Memahami Semiotika Media: Bandung Institute of Technology.

Wibowo, I. S. W. (2013). Semiotika Komunikasi: Aplikasi praktis bagi penelitian dan skripsi komunikasi. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media, 17.

Widodo, T. (2019). Makna Simbol Tradisi Tungguk Tembakau Desa. Senden Kecamatan. Selo Kabupaten. Boyolali. IAIN Surakarta, 23(3).

Yahya, H. (2018). Tradisi Menre’bola Baru Masyarakat Bugis Di Desa Kampiri Kecamatan Citta Kabupaten Soppeng (Studi Terhadap Nilai Kearifan Lokal).

Internet

rtikelpendidikan.id, (2023). ‘Memahami Konsep Project Based Learning: Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek’, Artikelpendidikan, https://artikelpendidikan.id/apa-itu-project-based-learning

Badolahi M. Z. (2017). “Bugis” Kinship Structure and Social Stratification. Kompasiana.com. https://www.kompasiana.com/muhammadzainuddinbadollahi/54f9479ca33311d33b8b5087/struktur-kekerabatan-dan-stratifikasi-sosial-bugis

Van Zoest, Aart. (1993). Semiotics: On Signs, How They Work, and What We Do with Them. Jakarta: Yayasan Sumber Agung. http://katalogdisperpusipprovjambi.perpusnas.go.id/detail-opac?id=17071