Dari Ruang Digital ke Ruang Publik: Representasi Kemarahan Publik dalam Podcast Bocor Alus Politik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55638/jcos.v8i2.2164Keywords:
Analisis Framing, podcast, ruang publik, Komunikasi politik, kemarahan publikAbstract
Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana podcast Bocor Alus Politik merepresentasikan kemarahan publik terhadap kekuasaan di ruang digital dan transformasinya ke wacana publik yang lebih luas. Menggunakan analisis framing Robert Entman, penelitian mengkaji episode “Kemarahan Publik terhadap Kekuasaan” yang disiarkan 30 Agustus 2025. Metode analisis konten kualitatif diterapkan pada transkrip podcast dan respons audiens di ruang publik digital. Temuan mengungkapkan podcast membingkai kemarahan melalui empat elemen: (1) pendefinisian masalah sebagai arogansi elite dan pemutusan aspirasi rakyat, terbukti dari data kenaikan tunjangan DPR 658 juta rupiah per bulan; (2) interpretasi kausal pada sistem oligarki politik dan perilaku elite sistematis; (3) evaluasi moral melegitimasi kemarahan sebagai respons demokratis yang diperlukan; dan (4) rekomendasi pengawasan publik berkelanjutan dan perlindungan hak berdemonstrasi. Podcast berfungsi sebagai counter-public sphere dengan narasi alternatif berbeda dari framing media mainstream. Resonansi audiens terlihat melalui komentar yang mengadopsi framing serupa dan menggunakan hashtag mobilisasi seperti #ResetIndonesia. Penelitian berkontribusi pada pemahaman peran podcast dalam wacana politik Indonesia, khususnya mentransformasi kemarahan digital menjadi ekspresi publik kolektif dan memperkuat demokrasi partisipatif.
References
Amal, M. I., Kartika, Muh. M. P., & Subagio, E. K. S. (2025). Journalistic Language as a Framing Tool: Analysis of Immanuel Ebenezer’s Reports on Kompas.com and Tempo.co. Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, 10(4), 1246–1263. https://akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/2594
Amal, M. I., Mursalim, M., & Karnay, S. (2024). Indonesian Criminal Code Draft (RKUHP) Objectivity on Tirto.id. Representamen, 10(02), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30996/representamen.v10i02.10617
Benkler, Y. (2006). Wealth of Networks : How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope : Social Movements in the Internet Age (2 ed.). Polity Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Eriyanto. (2018). Media dan Opini Publik: Bagaimana Media Menciptakan Isu (Agenda Setting), Melakukan Pembingkaian (Framing), dan Mengarahkan Pandangan Publik (Priming). Rajawali Pers.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere : An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation : Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage Publications Ltd.
Hall, S., Nixon, S., & Evans, J. (2025). Representation : Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (3 ed.). Sage.
Kartika, M. M. P., & Rahardjo, T. (2021). Kecenderungan agenda pemberitaan Tribun Timur terkait isu budaya uang panai. Kareba: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(2), 102–113. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/kareba/article/view/18493
Kartika, Muh. M. P. (2022). Konstruksi pemberitaan uang panai” di media daring: Analisis framing budaya uang panai” pada portal berita Tribun Timur [Tesis Magister]. Universitas Diponegoro.
Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018). News Framing Effects. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208077
Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of Human Communication (11 ed.). Waveland Press, Inc.
McCombs, M. E., & Valenzuela, S. (2021). Setting the agenda : the news media and public opinion (3 ed.). Polity Press.
Mietzner, M. (2020). Populist Anti-Scientism, Religious Polarisation, and Institutionalised Corruption: How Indonesia’s Democratic Decline Shaped Its COVID-19 Response. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420935561
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Ribertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3873260
Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Anger and forgiveness : resentment, generosity, justice. Oxford University Press.
Prior, M. (2019). Hooked : how politics captures people’s interest. Cambridge University Press.
Swart, J., Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2019). Sharing and Discussing News in Private Social Media Groups : The social function of news and current affairs in location-based, work-oriented and leisure-focused communities. Digital Journalism, 7(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1465351
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, D., & Ling, R. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Communication Sciences (JCoS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
