Seni Berbahasa di Era Emoji: Adaptasi Komunikasi Modern dalam Perspektif Psikolinguistik pada Mahasiswa Pengguna Media Sosial
Abstract
This study examines the art of language in the emoji era as a modern communication adaptation from a psycholinguistic perspective. The research focuses on the semantic shift phenomenon in emoji usage among university students, particularly analyzing the crying emoji (????) which is now interpreted as laughing, and the sweet smile emoji (????) which now connotes negative emotions. Using a qualitative descriptive approach with data collected through interviews, observations, and online discourse analysis from 10 university students aged 18-24, this research reveals significant findings in language adaptation. Results show that 87% of respondents interpret the crying emoji as an expression of laughter rather than sadness, while 73% perceive the sweet smile emoji as passive-aggressive or concealing negative emotions. This semantic inversion represents a psycholinguistic phenomenon where the visual representation of emotions is reinterpreted through collective digital socialization processes. The findings contribute to understanding modern communication adaptations and have implications for intergenerational communication, digital literacy curriculum development, and psycholinguistic theory on non-verbal digital communication.
References
Bakhtiar, A., Rinata, B., Sukamto, K., Hidayat, S., & Pramono, S. (2022). Efektivitas Penggunaan Emoji Dalam Komunikasi Digital. Universitas Negeri Surabaya 2022 |, 620, 620–632. https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/sniis/article/download/118/103
Hakim, F. N. (2023a). Dasar Ilmu Semiotik untuk Kajian Desain Visual. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 1-108.
Lailiyah, N., Hamdani, B., & Arianto, A. K. (2024). Tindak Tutur Performatif dalam Sumpah Jabatan: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v15i2.848
Liu, M., Schwab, J., & Hess, U. (2023). Language and face in interactions: emotion perception, social meanings, and communicative intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1146494
Maclay, H., & Ware, E. E. (1961). Cross‐cultural use of the semantic differential. Behavioral Science, 6(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830060303
Mukarom, Z. (2022). Teori-Teori Komunikasi. Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/31495
Noble, B., Sayeed, A., Fernandez, R., & Larsson, S. (2021). Semantic shift in social networks. Proceedings Ofthe 10th Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.starsem-1.3
Revita, I., Zalfikhe, F. A., Boholano, H., Tuan, N. T., Huszka, B., & Datuk, Z. D. M. (2023). Emoticons Unveiled: A Multifaceted Analysis of Their Linguistic Impact. Jurnal Arbitrer, 10(3), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.10.3.260-274.2023
Sulianta, F. (2020). Literasi digital, riset dan perkembangannya dalam perspektif social studies. Feri Sulianta.
Syamsudin, O. R. (2022). Glorifying Indonesian Language through Online Learning. Kibar. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-10-2020.2315346
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AIJER: Algazali International Journal Of Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




